Breast Cancer

Get Email Updates

Related Checklists

Breast Cancer Bloggers

Breast Cancer Guide

Maryann Gromisch RN Guide

Have a question? We're here to help. Ask the Community.

ASK

Free Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER!

Radiation Free Mammograms

By Joanna Karpasea-Jones HERWriter July 25, 2009 - 2:50pm
 
Rate This
1 comments View Comments

Researchers have previously found that mammograms have detected harmless tumors, leading to unnecessary invasive treatments and that 15% of more serious cancer is ‘missed’.

Some women can also find having a mammogram uncomfortable because the technician has to compress the breast between two metal plates in order to X-ray them.

The issue of whether radiation has any adverse effect on the breast has never been discussed by the medical profession.

Now doctors have come up with a revolutionary new mammogram that is radiation and pain free! They are using ultrasound technology to detect tumors in the breast. Radiologists from the Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, USA, suspend a woman’s breasts in water and fire ultrasound rays through them to generate images of the breast tissue. Not only is the new method pain free, it is said to be more accurate at picking up cancer than a traditional mammogram and uses no radiation so it’s safer for the patient.

Cancer sufferers have even described the warm water used in the technique as ‘very relaxing’.
The whole procedure takes only one minute and technicians are able to get many more images of the breast than they would through a regular mammogram. This reduces the number of unnecessary and painful biopsies.

The ultrasound has the added benefit of being able to distinguish between benign lumps and cancerous tumors, whereas X-ray mammograms cannot.

Dr. Neb Duric from the Karmanos Cancer Institute, said “Based on the more limited trails that we've done so far, it does in fact to appear to be more accurate than mammography.”

Other medical centers have found similar findings.

Future generations of women who choose screening should be in for a quicker, more comfortable, more effective and less risky way to monitor their health.

Joanna is a freelance health writer for The Mother magazine and Suite 101 with a column on infertility, http://infertility.suite101.com/. She is author of the book, 'Breast Milk: A Natural Immunisation,' and co-author of an educational resource on disabled parenting, in addition to running a charity for people damaged by vaccines or medical mistakes.

 
Rate This
1 comments View Comments

We value and respect the experiences of all of our HERWriters, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Joanna Karpasea-Jones HERWriter View Profile Send Message

I've been writing since the age of 7, when a serious operation put me in a wheelchair for 6 months and there was ...

http://infertility.suite101.com/

Add a Comment1 Comments

Image
Anonymous

Great article, Mammography is as outdated as those old X-ray machines in shoe-stores. If you ask how much radiation exposure you get with a Mammogram series, even radiologists never give you the correct answer since they do not know it themselves. In many modern countries they are all ready getting away from the old, outdated Mammography. It's about time women say no to antiquated health care.

July 26, 2009 - 5:31pm
Image CAPTCHA
By hitting submit, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

Improved

622 Health

Changed

294 Lives

Saved

213 Lives
4 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Health Theater Videos

View More Videos

Take our Featured Poll

Have you ever had breast cancer? :
View Results