This is pretty interesting because as time goes on, we learn more about how all of our fancy in-car gadgets are killing us. However, as time goes on we also have more in-car gadgets than ever to choose from. In any event, I don't think this is a problem best solved with laws. After all, how do you catch someone "being distracted" or "texting while driving," especially if the first time you notice them is after the crash?
I think education combined with a free-market approach makes the most sense. If people learn how dangerous being distracted is, then there's a lot of profit to be made by companies who make non-invasive, in-car gadgets.
Comment Reply
This is pretty interesting because as time goes on, we learn more about how all of our fancy in-car gadgets are killing us. However, as time goes on we also have more in-car gadgets than ever to choose from. In any event, I don't think this is a problem best solved with laws. After all, how do you catch someone "being distracted" or "texting while driving," especially if the first time you notice them is after the crash?
I think education combined with a free-market approach makes the most sense. If people learn how dangerous being distracted is, then there's a lot of profit to be made by companies who make non-invasive, in-car gadgets.
nickfromavvo
November 3, 2008 - 3:43pmFree legal advice
This Comment
Reply