Facebook Pixel

Comment Reply

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

The link between cancer rates and vitamin D deficiency was first proposed in 1980 by Garland. Since that time, 60 epidemiology studies have supported the hypothesis, a double blind placebo study confirmed up to a 77% reduction in cancer incidence for those on vitamin D supplements and two years ago the Canadian Cancer Society started recommending that everyone take vitamin D to prevent cancer. Experts on vitamin D will tell you the extent of the data on vitamin D preventing cancer is now as extensive as the data on smoking causing cancer. Correcting vitamin D deficiency is now so well accepted it is almost part of standard medical care. If your primary care physician does not check your levels it’s time to get a new doctor! At this late stage, NIH wants to start a placebo controlled study to prove that correcting a deficiency is good for you. (We are all deficient thanks to that other great piece of advice to stay out of the sun at all costs) Even worse, the study will probably come out negative because who in their right mind would stay on placebo for years and deliberately remain deficient. Once the participants in the study learn about vitamin D they will either drop out of the study or start taking extra vitamin D in case they are on placebo and the effect will be lost. In addition, fish oil contains significant amounts of vitamin A so unfortunately, apart from being 20 years too late with this study NIH has chosen to combine vitamin D with the one molecule on the planet that is known to antagonize the effects of vitamin D. Truly stunning!!!

June 23, 2009 - 11:26am

Reply

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy