I do not find this movement or these families inspiring in the least. I believe that when adults decide to have children, the adults should raise them, not the oldest children. From what I've read, there is no room for creativity in the children, especially the girls. These children have no choice but to follow the indoctrination of their parents. Parents should raise children, not siblings. Individuality is frowned upon as well. If the two adults choose to have this many children, what gives them the right to rob their children, (most particularly the girls), of a normal childhood. I find it absolutely inexcusable and a form of child abuse. As far as the maximum number of children per family is concerned, two is sufficient. Each child replaces each parent.
Comment Reply
I do not find this movement or these families inspiring in the least. I believe that when adults decide to have children, the adults should raise them, not the oldest children. From what I've read, there is no room for creativity in the children, especially the girls. These children have no choice but to follow the indoctrination of their parents. Parents should raise children, not siblings. Individuality is frowned upon as well. If the two adults choose to have this many children, what gives them the right to rob their children, (most particularly the girls), of a normal childhood. I find it absolutely inexcusable and a form of child abuse. As far as the maximum number of children per family is concerned, two is sufficient. Each child replaces each parent.
April 17, 2012 - 9:22amThis Comment
Reply