Plenty of people who have lots of expertise in sexuality agree with the commonsense of the author. The uniquely mobile, richly innervated foreskin functions exactly as it was naturally selected / divinely designed to do, give pleasure to both partners. This was known for centuries, both to its friends and enemies, before circumcision became customary in the USA. See http://www.circumstitions.com/Pleasure.html
Voluntary circumcision should stay that way - not be imposed on babies, children or young men. If adult men think a slight (and dubious) reduction in HIV tranmission from women (but not the other way, possibly an increased risk) is worth it, they can always choose to have it done. That is quite irrelevant here.
Comment Reply
Plenty of people who have lots of expertise in sexuality agree with the commonsense of the author. The uniquely mobile, richly innervated foreskin functions exactly as it was naturally selected / divinely designed to do, give pleasure to both partners. This was known for centuries, both to its friends and enemies, before circumcision became customary in the USA. See http://www.circumstitions.com/Pleasure.html
July 30, 2012 - 7:56pmVoluntary circumcision should stay that way - not be imposed on babies, children or young men. If adult men think a slight (and dubious) reduction in HIV tranmission from women (but not the other way, possibly an increased risk) is worth it, they can always choose to have it done. That is quite irrelevant here.
This Comment
Reply