I did not infer that you employ any illegals. I obviously don't know. I was implying that just as scripture can be used to justify circumcision, it can also (and has been) used to justify slavery, and therefore we should not rely on scripture for our decision-making today.
The military has no policy on circumcision today and your son is as likely to encounter intact men there as anywhere, but I imagine he has figured out the difference by now.
Why are you so surprised than men take exception to women thinking they have a right to irrevocably cut erogenous parts off people who will become men? It is not us there is anything the matter with.
Comment Reply
I did not infer that you employ any illegals. I obviously don't know. I was implying that just as scripture can be used to justify circumcision, it can also (and has been) used to justify slavery, and therefore we should not rely on scripture for our decision-making today.
The military has no policy on circumcision today and your son is as likely to encounter intact men there as anywhere, but I imagine he has figured out the difference by now.
Why are you so surprised than men take exception to women thinking they have a right to irrevocably cut erogenous parts off people who will become men? It is not us there is anything the matter with.
April 1, 2010 - 5:42pmThis Comment
Reply