If a man is intact, he should wear a condom. If a man is circumcised, he should wear a condom. This is not rocket science folks. Safe sex results in minimal risk of acquiring HIV. Circumcision is guaranteed to remove erogenous tissue from the man's sex organ. I would much rather have a whole penis and wear a condom than the alternative of having a less sensitive penis and wearing a condom. Many think that the HIV rate is higher in the US than in non-circumcising Europe because men in the US do not like wearing condoms because it does not feel good to wear a condom. The circumcised penis is less sensitive than an intact penis and the condom reduces sensitivity even more.
Infant circumcision just does not make sense for reducing HIV rates in the United States.
Comment Reply
If a man is intact, he should wear a condom. If a man is circumcised, he should wear a condom. This is not rocket science folks. Safe sex results in minimal risk of acquiring HIV. Circumcision is guaranteed to remove erogenous tissue from the man's sex organ. I would much rather have a whole penis and wear a condom than the alternative of having a less sensitive penis and wearing a condom. Many think that the HIV rate is higher in the US than in non-circumcising Europe because men in the US do not like wearing condoms because it does not feel good to wear a condom. The circumcised penis is less sensitive than an intact penis and the condom reduces sensitivity even more.
Infant circumcision just does not make sense for reducing HIV rates in the United States.
June 17, 2010 - 12:42pmThis Comment
Reply