Maybe they should just circumcise in-utero. That way the baby's choice doesn't yet matter correct? I see the point in the baby choosing whether or not to have this procedure but let's be morally consistent here. The baby doesn't have a choice about whether he/she will be born, aborted, who his/her parents are, whether they are ready to be parents. Where is the line?
Comment Reply
Maybe they should just circumcise in-utero. That way the baby's choice doesn't yet matter correct? I see the point in the baby choosing whether or not to have this procedure but let's be morally consistent here. The baby doesn't have a choice about whether he/she will be born, aborted, who his/her parents are, whether they are ready to be parents. Where is the line?
November 18, 2010 - 9:16amThis Comment
Reply