How selfish is it for women to use lower cervical cancer as a reason to circumcise baby boys?
so now it's the babies fault? A woman contracts HPV because she didn't use a condom, and it's the uncircumcised babies fault?
So adult women's health is forced on an infant male?
Would we force adult men health issues on baby girls?
it doesnt matter if circumcision reduces HPV, at all. its the boys body, and the women's responsibility to practice safe sex
If boys have to lose 20,000 for women's health, what are they going to owe us?
Comment Reply
How selfish is it for women to use lower cervical cancer as a reason to circumcise baby boys?
so now it's the babies fault? A woman contracts HPV because she didn't use a condom, and it's the uncircumcised babies fault?
So adult women's health is forced on an infant male?
Would we force adult men health issues on baby girls?
it doesnt matter if circumcision reduces HPV, at all. its the boys body, and the women's responsibility to practice safe sex
If boys have to lose 20,000 for women's health, what are they going to owe us?
April 16, 2011 - 4:07pmThis Comment
Reply