It is certainly a step forward that a foreskin is not being treated as problematic, but there's always room for improvement, starting with the word "uncircumcised" which treats having part missing as the norm. The word of choice is "intact".
None of the above experts seems to have any first-hand experience of owning his own foreskin! Why is The Frisky so intent on "getting to the head"? Does Dr Kerner not know that the frenulum is at the beginning and end of the ridged band of nerves that encircles the inside of the foreskin? The frenulum only becomes important when all of that has been cut off.
Yes, the foreskin itself is highy sensitive, but differently from the head (glans) contributing "a symphony of sensation". Some men can reach orgasm using nothing else, so it should be treated not so much "like any other sensitive body part" but like the unique body part that it is.
Comment Reply
It is certainly a step forward that a foreskin is not being treated as problematic, but there's always room for improvement, starting with the word "uncircumcised" which treats having part missing as the norm. The word of choice is "intact".
None of the above experts seems to have any first-hand experience of owning his own foreskin! Why is The Frisky so intent on "getting to the head"? Does Dr Kerner not know that the frenulum is at the beginning and end of the ridged band of nerves that encircles the inside of the foreskin? The frenulum only becomes important when all of that has been cut off.
Yes, the foreskin itself is highy sensitive, but differently from the head (glans) contributing "a symphony of sensation". Some men can reach orgasm using nothing else, so it should be treated not so much "like any other sensitive body part" but like the unique body part that it is.
February 12, 2012 - 6:06pmThis Comment
Reply