Dedicated to women's health and well-being

Ask

Sponsored By

Cryoablation vs. electroablation ( REA or rollerball ablation? ) Any experiences?

July 8, 2009 - 9:41am 207 reads 1 comments

I'm 39 years old and have had one child (now 17 years old). A year ago I started having periods that last anywhere from 2 weeks straight, or heavy interrmitent bleeding. Every period comes with excruciating cramping, fatigue and huge disgusting blood clots. I've had uterine fibroids removed 13 years ago via laparoscopy and had an ovarian cyst removed almost 2 years ago. I'm scheduled to see a new Gyn. next month and the term "cryo ablation" has been mentioned by primary care physician.

Has anybody had either cryo ablation or REA (known as 'roller-ball' ablation)? I'm curious as to the pro's and cons of each - especially recovery time.

Thank you.

~ Michelle

Add A New Comment Report Abuse

Start Asking & Sharing

Add A New Comment1 Comments

Diane Porter

Michelle, we have quite a few women on our site who have experience with cryoablation procedures. There are even a couple of long threads where various women have talked about how it went for them and what their recoveries were like. You can find them by typing cryoablation into our search box. Here is the thread with the most conversation on it:

http://www.empowher.com/community/ask/has-anyone-had-her-option-cryo-abl...

I don't come up with anything on our site on roller-ball ablation or REA. It seems like an older procedure? What has your doctor told you about its pros and cons?

Here's a 2003 study that says the cryoablation requires less anesthesia but that the REA (called electroablation here) reduced menstrual bleeding about 10% more:

http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/aagl/article/PIIS1074...

And here's a reference that says that cryoablation patients had about a 1% to 2% better chance of success at 12- and 24-months afterward than electroablation patients, and cryablation needed retreatment about 1% less often than electroablation:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12634643

All those statistics are very close together. I'm wondering if your doctor feels that one treatment has an advantage over the other for any reason? Can you share her or his reasoning with us here?

Log in

Are you a member? Log in first to track your posts

Not a member? Join us. Membership is not required to post.

More information about formatting options

We never share email addresses with third parties. Your email address will be used to notify you of activity on your post and send you our newsletter if you choose to sign up for it.
Verify that you are a human (not a computer):
This is necessary to prevent computer programs from automatically posting spam or other irrelevant content on EmpowHer.com. Enter the characters in the box to the left (case sensitive). Do not enter spaces between the characters.
Image CAPTCHA

EmpowHer's Health Newsletter

The latest women's health news delivered to you each week

Featured Provider Discover more about the nation's top provider.

Essure

Essure

The Essure procedure, FDA approved since 2002, is a permanent birth control method that can be performed in the comfort of a doctor’s office in about 10 minutes without hormones, cutting, burning or t

Health News Read up-to-the-minute medical news & stories.

Heart-Pacing Devices Hold Promise for Heart Failure

THURSDAY, Oct. 1 (HealthDay News) -- New research provides more evidence that a new type of pacemaker/defibrillator technology may be a good option for patients with mild forms of heart ...
Read more