Facebook Pixel

What's the difference between CML and ALL? Which one is most dangerous?

By December 20, 2012 - 9:41am
Rate This

Add a Comment3 Comments

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia and c.m.l which one is the most dangerous?

December 22, 2012 - 10:32am

thanks Susan!
your answare is very helpful to me

December 22, 2012 - 10:30am
HERWriter Guide

Hi Arshad Khan

Chronic leukemia is build up over months or years and can be treated straight away or monitored for some time to see what happens with cell development - they my be able to be contained. 

Acute is a leukemia that happens quite suddenly and needs to be treated straight away because the cancerous cells can spread quite quickly through the body. So for that reason, it could be said that Acute may be more dangerous to the rapid nature of it's development and spread.



December 20, 2012 - 1:45pm
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy
Add a Comment

All user-generated information on this site is the opinion of its author only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions. Members and guests are responsible for their own posts and the potential consequences of those posts detailed in our Terms of Service.


Get Email Updates

Related Checklists

Leukemia Guide


Have a question? We're here to help. Ask the Community.


Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!