Improved
6112 HealthChanged
3786 LivesSaved
3568 Lives0 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More
Women are getting proactive about their health needs and rights. The financial downturn has made it crystal clear that women’s economic status is intertwined with the health care equation.
On April 1st and 2nd in New York City, a National Women’s Speakout for Action on Health Reform, combined with a Strategy Conference, was held. Sponsored by Raising Women’s Voices, the first day dealt with how to amplify women’s concerns and integrate their opinions into the health care discussion, building from the grassroots level up. A workshop was devoted to developing the appropriate skills for eliciting personal stories from women, which could be introduced into the larger conversation. The strategies of new media and social networking were referenced as tools that could exponentially expand the efforts to influence public policy. Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC News Medical Editor, moderated a two-hour speak- out for action. The focus was to bring the modalities learned for organizational outreach back to the community.
Day two featured a host of top speakers sharing their insights on how to jumpstart reform in a way that puts women’s interests squarely in the middle of the health care landscape. Individual presenters parsed varying agendas, with each pointing out inequities in the existing formula.
Deborah Reid, a staff attorney in the Washington D.C. office of the National Health Law Program addressed “systems issues” and the disparity in the distribution of services. She emphasized that health care should “not be seen as a commodity, but as a public good.” She pointed to data on the low birth rate — under 5 pounds — of babies born to women of color (13 per cent for African-Americans; 6.4 per cent for Latinas). Reid identified the wall of silence facing the LGBT community explaining, “People don’t want to talk about it.”
Commenting on the difference in the political atmosphere from a year ago, Martha Livingston, Ph.D., pushed hard for support of pending House Resolution 676, which she qualified as “health care with principles.” Framing the debate as a “moral issue and a question of “justice,” she was adamant that women needed to seize “a moment of opportunity we will not see again for awhile.” Using visceral language to drive her thought home, Livingston said about the uninsured, “Statistics are human beings with the tears wiped away.”
Jennifer Ng’andu, Associate Director of NCLR, the largest national Hispanic civil rights/advocacy organization in the country, addressed the need for revisions that would help the Hispanic community. The evidence of marginalization is in the numbers. Hispanics have the highest rate of being uninsured.
Senior Advisor for Health and Reproductive Rights at the National Women’s Law Center, Lisa Codispoti, underscored how “wedge issues” such as abortion, family planning, and immigration rights have divided women. She entreated the audience to ensure that diverse advocacy groups work together. Codispoti underscored that women face affordability issues more than men. Women pay more than men for coverage in forty states (“gender-rating”); only 12 per cent of insurance plans offer comprehensive maternity coverage. Codispoti also called for an acknowledgment of the challenges facing women with disabilities, and the need for accessibility to programs for mental health and drug/alcohol treatment programs.
The United States is paying more for health care and getting less. In a distributed handout on why the country needs to pass H.R. 676, a graph showed how America stacked up against France, Sweden, Italy and Finland. It wasn’t encouraging. All four nations have Universal Healthcare and paid parental leave. It was noted that other industrialized nations have either free or subsidized childcare and eldercare.
Loretta Ross depicted the current structure as a “skewed system with too many specialists and not enough primary care providers.” Elizabeth R. Benjamin pointed to big pharmaceutical companies and large hospitals pronouncing, “It’s all about reimbursement.” The oft-repeated phrase when the format moved to a question and answer period was, “Women get second class health care.”
However, participants stressed the belief that change was possible, particularly with “a new President and Congress committed to health reform.” But it cannot be left up to the lawmakers and established alliances to do all the work. Each woman must be vocal about her needs, and join with others to move the dialogue forward.
Below is a list of resources culled from material at the event:
OWL – The Voice of Midlife and Older Women
www.owl-national.org
Our Bodies Ourselves – Information on a Range of Women’s Health
Topics. Excerpts from the series of the Our Bodies, Ourselves books.
www.ourbodiesourselves.org
Health Care for America Now – National Grassroots Campaign to Win
Affordable Healthcare for All
www.healthcareforamericanow.org
Amnesty International – Researching human rights violations affecting maternal health in the United States (i.e. Finding or paying for maternity related health care)
Contact Anita Kumar: [email protected]
The Birth Survey – Providing women with insight into maternity health care practices in their community
www.thebirthsurvey.com
Susan G. Komen for the Cure – National website for global leader in the breast cancer movement
www.komen.org
Add a Comment2 Comments
Marcia,
Thank you for giving important attention to the recent Raising Women's Voices event. I wanted to bring to the attention of those interested in these issues, another important resource. Dr. Snyderman is Editor in Chief of BeWell.com a consumer social networking site on health. Along with Dr. Susan Love, Dr. Janet Taylor, Dr. Miriam Nelson, Dr. Alice Domar, along with many others including Byllye Avery (one of the organizers of the Raising Women's Voices event). Thanks for bringing the important issue of the many aspects of healthcare reform to light.
Cheryl Heiks,
May 1, 2009 - 9:04amDirector of Communication
www.BeWell.com
This Comment
Support of HR 676 is support for women, and men, children and seniors for the decades to come, and it is so because it is fiscally responsible, medically necessary, and morally tenable. Our current for-profit-health-insurance-industry can't claim any of that.
April 29, 2009 - 4:10pmThis Comment