Cigarettes Need Bigger, Bolder Warning Labels--With Pictures, says WHO

As in all cases against Tobacco, the proof of harm is all circumstantial and no positive proof is ever presented. As in the comment above which mentions SHS as being a health threat in the link provided. Not one person has been proven to have died due to SHS and Smoking is only one of dozens of possible causes. It is impossible for Epidemiology to pinpoint any single cause and that is the specific reason it is used. Studies find the predetermined cause or funding will be withdrawn. Without funding no studies would be done and this is the reason fraud can be found in at least 29% of all studies.
Even the MSA agreement found no positive proof. Tobacco companies settled to stop suits and passed the cost to consumers. Fraud was a definite possibility and is still being investigated. Politically correctness has more to do with how a case is judged than proof.
One thing is certain, when it comes to lying about the Health effects Tobacco Products the so-called Health Departments, ACS, ALA, NCI and the rest of the agencies will be Politically correct and funded by the Pharmaceuticals that sell NRT;'S.
See below.

The Scientific Scandal of Antismoking
http://members.iinet.com.au/~ray/TSSOASb.html

"This refusal to consider conflicting evidence is the negation of the scientific method. It has been the hallmark of fifty years of anti smoking propaganda and what with good reason may well be described as one of the greatest scandals in 500 years of modern science."

This one of the best in-depth studies of how studies are done and their conclusions are reached. To say the least, this will open eyes to the truth of Smoking and Second Hand Smoke. It is long but more than worth the time. The conclusions will surprise all who finish it.

Here is information on another courtroom loss for Big Tobacco: http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/6315#more-6315

Who is going to put a big bold warning label on WHO, RWJF aka J&J who funds anti smoking and profits from their own nicotine and WHO is not paying attention?

The ACS, ALA, AHA needs a warning so big they will have to drag it, anti smoking is a danger to society

WHO, come on now, do not insult our intelligence!

I wouldn't dare. You do it well enough without help. Apparently you have researched information only on ACS/RWJF approved sites or you have had too much ACS Kool-Aid. I drank it before I started researching SHS in 1998. I also noticed that anyone who disagrees with Tobacco Control are called names or vilified because Anti's have nothing but Lies to fall back on. All diseases blamed on Tobacco are on the increase, while at the same time Tobacco use has fallen from 54% to less than 24%. Correlation does not prove causation. If the true numbers are used the inescapable fact is, as Tobacco use goes down disease goes up. Not one person has been proven to have died from SHS/ETS, period.

WHO, come on now, do not insult our intelligence! Do you really think this will make a difference one way or the other! This actually might increase the sale of products like invisismoke or even cigarette cases!

I get no funding from any source. I just like to spread the truth and this seems to be the only way. Major Media will not print the truth.

The Scientific Scandal of Antismoking
http://members.iinet.com.au/~ray/TSSOASb.html

"This refusal to consider conflicting evidence is the negation of the scientific method. It has been the hallmark of fifty years of anti smoking propaganda and what with good reason may well be described as one of the greatest scandals in 500 years of modern science."

This one of the best in-depth studies of how studies are done and their conclusions are reached. To say the least, this will open eyes to the truth of Smoking and Second Hand Smoke. It is long but more than worth the time. The conclusions will surprise all who finish it.

All things considered, including that the RWJF (pharma foundation) supplies the funds for smoking bans with grants to the American Cancer Society, it seems the industry that makes the no-smoke products (pharma) has the WHO in its pocket. 'To thine own self be true.'

Nice to see big tobacco's back spreading their BS, same as they've done for the last 50 years. The _hate_ graphic warning labels.

The tobacco prevention groups have become so perverted that anything the WHO does at this point is just overkill.

Will the WHO put similar warnings on their smoking cessation products which cause oral cancer, diabetes, tooth loss, hair loss and suicide? Will the WHO let people know that smoking cessation products are 98.6 % inneffective?