True or False: We Only Use 10% of Our Brains
For centuries, psychics, clairvoyants, and other psuedo-scientific charlatans have touted their own extraordinary perceptive powers by saying that ordinary people only use 10% of their brains.
This is a great hook because it makes the rest of us think that if we just tapped into the other 90% of our brains, we too could do amazing things. But, alas, most of us are already using all of the resources our brains have to offer.
Evidence for the Health Claim
No medical evidence supports the theory that we use only a small portion of our brains.
One plausible explanation for the continuation of this unfounded assumption could be that scientists still only have an incomplete understanding of the human brain. So while we may know that most people use the majority of their brain on a daily basis; we can’t claim to know how each part of the brain actually works.
Because neurologists have studied brain activity in people as they perform a wide variety of tasks, we do know that simple, menial activities only require us to engage a small portion of our brains. In these cases, therefore, there may be some truth to the 10% theory.
By way of comparison, think of your kitchen as your brain. When you cook dinner for a group of people, you probably use the majority of the space and appliances that you have. When you make toast, however, you use far fewer resources. So, in mental “toast” cases, we often have no need to use the bulk of our brains.
Proponents of the 10% theory sometimes hold it up as evidence that we don’t use our brains efficiently. They point to scientific research showing that many parts of the brain can, and do, perform similar or even identical tasks. However, brain researchers argue that these redundancies are necessary to prevent lapses in function. For example, if one pathway of your brain doesn’t get the message from your eyes that the traffic light has turned red, another pathway can take over and send a message to your foot to step on the brake. So, while redundancies exist, they are beneficial, even essential, for our survival.
Evidence Against the Health Claim
Abundant evidence from clinical neurology indicates that most people use the majority of their brains while both awake and asleep. Brain imaging has shown that more than 60% of our brain is active during REM, or rapid eye movement, sleep when we are dreaming.
Neurologists have used electrical stimulation (with local anesthetic) on live human brains and found no dormant areas in the brain—areas which might be expected if only a small portion of the brain is being used. Also, in extensive studies of
It is also difficult to explain why we would have evolved such a massive brain if we only utilize such a small percentage of its volume. Large brains require large heads to house them, which increases the risks associated with childbirth. If we derive no advantage from having such oversized brains, then why has nature left us with all that excess brain mass, which consumes a lot of wasted energy and predisposes us to unnecessary harm?
It is exciting to think that we can expand our minds by tapping into unused portions of our brains. However, researchers have yet to discover any large areas of inactivity. Although at times it may seem that some of us can’t possibly be using more than a tiny fraction of our mental capacities, it takes far more than 10% for humans to be human. Consider it a compliment—you are using your whole brain.
Baltimore B. Ask the expert: biology: do we really use only 10% of our brains? Scientific American website. Available at: http://www.sciam.com/askexpert_question.cfm?articleID=000B077E-AD46-1047-AD4683414B7F0000&ref=sciam . Published March 2004. Accessed November 5, 2008.
Chundler E. Do we use only 10% of our brain? University of Washington website. Available at: http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/pdf/tenper.pdf . Published October 2005. Accessed November 5, 2008.
How did we get so smart? Study sheds light on evolution of the brain. Princeton University website. Available at http://www.princeton.edu/pr/news/01/q2/0509-brain.htm . Accessed November 5, 2008.
Radford B. The ten percent myth. Snopes website. Available at: http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm . Updated July 2007. Accessed November 5, 2008.
Rod MR, Wishaw IQ, Auer RN. The relationship of structural ischemic brain damage to neurobehavioural deficit: the effect of postischemic MK-801. Can J Psychol . 1990;196-200.
Roy E. The anatomy of a head injury. Centre for Habilitation Education and Research, University of Waterloo website. Available at: http://www.ahs.uwaterloo.ca/~cahr/headfall.html . Accessed November 5, 2008.
Wesson K. Brain basics for the teaching professional. Science Master website. Available at http://www.sciencemaster.com/columns/wesson/wesson_part_05.php . Published February 2002. Accessed November 5, 2008.
Image Credit: Nucleus Communications, Inc.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Copyright © 2007 EBSCO Publishing All rights reserved.