Hide This

FREEHER HealthToolkit

HER Health Toolkit

Sign up for EmpowHER updates and you'll receive our
FREE HER Health Toolkit

Obesity

Get Email Updates

Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!

Large Soda Ban in NYC Dismissed and Mississippi Agrees

By Susan Cody HERWriter Guide
 
Rate This
Large Soda Ban in NYC Dismissed and Mississippi Agrees 1 5 1
Mississippi agrees with dismissal of NYC's large soda ban
Hemera/Thinkstock

I wrote an article for EmpowHER recently about Mayor Bloomberg's attempt to ban large sugary drinks from restaurants.

He wanted these super-sized behemoths to be taken off menus. A person would still be able to get a pretty large drink and have free refills.

His attempt failed due to the ban being blocked by a New York judge, at least for now.

Many in New York are upset. They think that legally curbing certain food choices (much like was done with trans fats) will lead to better health in general and lessen medical costs for the growing epidemic of obesity.

But others, including the state of Mississippi, vehemently disagree.

Citing personal choice and a distaste for government or legal interference with individual rights, this attempted ban on large sugary drinks caused an uproar. Commentators talked about their choice to eat or drink anything (in any amount) without any kind of interference.

Some compared these choices to the abortion debate.

Commentators wonder when the government will stop trying to run the lives of private citizens while others wonder why obese people who make poor nutritional choices should get free health care for their obesity-related illnesses, causing higher taxes or insurance hikes.

Sarah Palin showed up at a GOP conference, sipping a huge soda, telling the crowd that it's "just pop, with low-cal ice cubes in it." She received thunderous applause. Read more here: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/sarah_pops_off_at_mike_eimIanq47kg...

Mississippi has taken it a little further, passing what some call the "Anti-Bloomberg Bill" (not the official name of the law), stating that no government entity other than State legislation can pass a bill like this.

Governor Phil Bryant signed this bill stating that "It simply is not the role of the government to micro-regulate citizens' dietary decisions," the governor wrote about his decision, "...the responsibility for one's personal health depends on individual choices about a proper diet and appropriate exercise."

Add a Comment2 Comments

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

Soda( Sugar) was to be the "Big bad Wolf" and this is nonsense. Soda has been around for over 100 years with no obesity problem ....Sugar is not the problem EXCESS sugar,Milk, butter,cheese or almost anything else is a problem. Blaming Soda was ignorant of him

When will we expose the truth culprits...Fake Sweeteners Splenda, Equal and Sweet and Low are poisons that cause obesity but the FDA is silent about this

See Here diabetes foot blue

what to eat diabetes

March 27, 2013 - 9:50pm
Lynda F

Good piece, Susan. I'm a born New Yorker, who transplanted herself to Arizona (and all in good time from what I can tell). While I understand the concerns, I don't think government, on any level, has the right to dictate our personal choices. The minute it is allowed in one area, it snowballs into all the others. It started with smoking, is now onto obesity. What will follow that, and where will it stop? There will always be something that others think no one should be doing because they don't like it. We can't take away the free will (ability to choose for ourselves) that God gave us.

IF the argument really is higher medical costs, then you are talking a slippery slope with no end in sight. Look at boxers and football players, suffering head injuries. Is that not a "self-induced" medical issue due to their choices? Their medical care/needs also raises our costs and premiums. What about runners later in life with all kinds of joint problems from all the "healthy" running they did in their earlier years. That can easily also be called "self-induced" as they chose to do all that running in order to be "healthy".

There are far too many things that can affect all of us, regardless of what we do or don't do. Look at all the people who do everything right and still get these so-called smoking/obesity/sports related medical problems.

I'm not advocating that we do "unhealthy" things, but what is unhealthy for one, is not necessarily unhealthy for another.

Just my two cents.

March 27, 2013 - 12:10pm
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Improved

1710 Health

Changed

643 Lives

Saved

497 Lives
0 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Take Our Featured Health Poll

How often do you diet?:
View Results