Osteoarthritis

Get Email Updates

Osteoarthritis Guide

Maryann Gromisch RN Guide

Have a question? We're here to help. Ask the Community.

ASK

Free Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER!

Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Surgery

By Joanna Karpasea-Jones HERWriter August 7, 2011 - 6:12am
 
Rate This
0 comments View Comments
Osteoarthritis related image Photo: Getty Images

Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is a new type of hip replacement surgery that is less stressful on the patient.

Minimally invasive surgery requires a smaller scar, which can be as small as 5cm, compared with the traditional hip replacement scar that is 20-30cm in length. Occasionally two small scars are needed. Division of muscles is not always necessary and when it is, it is less extensive than in traditional surgery. Surgeons can see what they are doing when they replace the joint by using special computer aided technology to see inside the body with cameras and the patient can stay awake during the procedure by having an epidural anaesthetic. This could be helpful for older patients who may not tolerate general anaesthetic very well.

Benefits of Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement

• Lower risk of death after surgery.
• Less risk of anaesthetic awareness during surgery. With epidural a patient can alert surgeons if he or she is in pain.
• Less blood loss – most patients don’t require blood transfusion.
• Less muscle damage.
• A smaller scar that is cosmetically more appealing.
• Less pain after surgery due to smaller incision.
• The use of epidural also reduces post-operative pain because the pain relief can last for up to 20 hours after surgery.
• A faster recovery – a hospital stay of only one or two days is common after minimally invasive hip surgery, compared with around five days for traditional hip surgery. 91 percent of patients were able to stand up the day after surgery, compared with only 85 percent who had traditional surgery.
• Patients can walk without help a lot quicker, sometimes discontinuing walking aids as early as eight days afterwards.
• There is no significant difference in the performance of the artificial hip when a minimally invasive technique is done.
• There is no significant difference in rates of bone fracture and the need for "revisions" soon after surgery.

Disadvantages of Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement

• The technique is highly specialized and fewer surgeons are trained to do it.

 
Rate This
0 comments View Comments

We value and respect the experiences of all of our HERWriters, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Joanna Karpasea-Jones HERWriter View Profile Send Message

I've been writing since the age of 7, when a serious operation put me in a wheelchair for 6 months and there was ...

http://infertility.suite101.com/

Around the Web

Add a CommentComments

There are no comments yet. Be the first one and get the conversation started!

Image CAPTCHA
By hitting submit, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

Improved

620 Health

Changed

293 Lives

Saved

210 Lives
1 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Take our Featured Poll

Have you ever had problems with your mental health? What did you do about it? :
View Results