Hide This

FREEHER HealthToolkit

HER Health Toolkit

Sign up for EmpowHER updates and you'll receive our
FREE HER Health Toolkit

Pregnancy

Get Email Updates

Resource Centers

Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!

Title X Funding In Danger Of Being Cut

By Bailey Mosier
 
Rate This

The Title X Family Planning program was enacted in 1970 and is a federal grant program that provides birth control and preventive health services for more than five million low-income people annually.

But for the second time in 2011, GOP lawmakers are trying to axe the program in an effort to cut government spending. What government officials don’t realize is that the funding for preventive birth services is a substantially lesser cost to the government than a Medicaid-funded birth.

According to a report by the Huffington Post, “House Republicans already cut funds for Title X by 5.5 percent during budget negotiations earlier this year, and health advocates say that even that small cut was devastating to the increasing number of unemployed and uninsured people who rely on the program for basic health and preventative care.”

The May 2010 Guttmacher Institute study reports that the cost of covering a Medicaid-funded birth -- including prenatal care, delivery, postpartum and infant care for a year -- was an estimated $12,613 in 2008.

Sure, that sounds like a lot, but compare that to the average cost of providing birth control and other contraceptive services to low-income women at Title X-funded clinics: a mere $257 per client per year.

Yes, it’s true that the government spends a whopping $300 million a year on the Title X program, but in 2008 alone, it saved the country $3.4 billion dollars compared the alternative.

The decision to axe Title X comes included in a bill for fiscal year 2012 that aims to “eliminate 79 wasteful programs.” The budget would also withdraw funds for Planned Parenthood, cut funding for teen pregnancy prevention initiatives and redirect it toward "abstinence only" education programs, and prevent abortions from being covered by insurance under the Affordable Care Act.

"In 2009, 5.2 million patients sought care through this program, and we're expecting to see higher numbers for 2010 because of the recession," said Clare Coleman, President and CEO of the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association. "Congress doesn't get it. This battle over Title X will not save the government any money.

Add a Comment1 Comments

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

Title X is fiscally conservative, saves Taxpayers millions each year, and helps uninsured and low-income persons get life saving screenings for breast and cervical cancer, diabetes, hypertension, nutrition, urinary tract infections, HIV, STD, etc. Title X was introduced then representaives James Scheur (D-NY) and George Bush (R-TX) and Senators Joseph Tydings (D-MD) and Charles Percy (R-IL). Thus, Title X had full support of intelligent elected officials from BOTH parties who based legislation on facts. It still saves the lives of men and women, keeps mothers healthy, helps babies be born healthier, helps couples grow families responsibly even though they are low-income and/or uninsured. But....most importantly, Title X REDUCES the need for abortion. In doing so, it is the most proven and highly effective publicly funded pro-life program in existence today!

October 13, 2011 - 12:31pm
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Tags

Improved

1880 Health

Changed

775 Lives

Saved

643 Lives
9 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Take Our Featured Health Poll

Do you support the idea of a single woman using In Vitro Fertilization to have a baby?:
View Results