Hide This

FREEHER HealthToolkit

HER Health Toolkit

Sign up for EmpowHER updates and you'll receive our
FREE HER Health Toolkit

Relationships & Family

Get Email Updates

Relationships & Family Guide

Cary Cook BSN RN

Have a question? We're here to help. Ask the Community.

ASK

Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!

Reactance Theory: The Cause of Your Partner's Wandering Eye

By Malu Banuelos
 
Rate This

Remember when you were still in the courting stage of your relationship? When your partner chased you relentlessly, until you found out that he had eyes not only for you but for virtually every other woman?

Women are often dumbfounded by this sequence of events. First a man chases her but when he has her, he seems to want every woman except for her. This might lead women to believe that they are the root of the problem when, in fact, it could be due to reactance theory.

“When people feel that their freedom to choose an action is threatened, they get an unpleasant feeling called ‘reactance’. This also motivates them to perform the threatened behavior, thus proving that their free will has not been compromised,” ChangingMinds.org reported.

When you are pursued by a man, he does it willingly, it’s his choice. When commitment is established, however, he may realize that there are things he is no longer able to do and other women he may no longer pursue.

In his book The Power of Losing Control: Finding Strength, Meaning, and Happiness in an out-of-Control World, Joe Caruso writes, “There’s an important distinction to be made between decision and commitment. Decisions are firm but not binding; they allow us to ‘change our mind.’ A commitment, on the other hand, is backed by the power of will and has the effect of becoming a way of life.” Men may perceive choice very differently than they do commitment because in contrast to choice, commitment is binding.

“The story of the forbidden quince [fruit] underscores a general human tendency to want what we cannot have. Reactance theory (Brehm, 1966) posits that people respond forcefully to threats to their own liberty by doubling their efforts to maintain their sense of freedom and autonomy. Hence, forbidding people from having something typically makes them desire it more. One implication is that being prevented from paying attention to alternative relationship partners may make those alternatives seem all the more enticing,” said the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

If you’re told not to think about something in particular, what is the one thing that you can’t stop thinking about?

Add a Comment1 Comments

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

Perhaps I expect too much but this is a cliched story. Perhaps a more useful angle would be describing practicle ways of dealing with these situations and appropriate approaches to ones relationships? It always bugs me when we hear about "issues" but authors fail to provide useful advice for the reader.

November 29, 2011 - 8:30am
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Improved

1876 Health

Changed

772 Lives

Saved

638 Lives
11 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Take Our Featured Health Poll

Are you confident about your smile?:
View Results