Improved
6112 HealthChanged
3785 LivesSaved
3568 Lives0 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More
By the end of the week dust had begun to settle over federal officials who stated that the recommended annual breast exam for women over 40 need only to take place every other year and not until they are into their 50s. The statement drew criticism from an assortment of people in the medical community and struck a chord with many cancer survivors who attribute the early detection of cancer cells to an annual mammogram exam. While the officials defend their statements by stating they were shared primarily to educate the female population on the necessity of an annual breast exam, the information did not go down easily for many American women.
Just as the public began to digest the recommendation, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology released early Friday that the annual pap smear, given to women in their 20’s to test for abnormalities in their cervix, may not be necessary and women should plan on taking this only every other year. The recommendation to have your cervix examined every two years is focused around results that the slow-growing cancer may go unchanged within the two years and iannual visits are therefore unnecessary.
The report, published by the Associated Press states:
• Routine Paps should start at age 21. Previously, ACOG had urged a first Pap either within three years of first sexual intercourse or at age 21.
• Women 30 and older should wait three years between Paps once they've had three consecutive clear tests. Other national guidelines have long recommended the three-year interval; ACOG had previously backed a two- to three-year wait.
• Women with HIV, other immune-weakening conditions or previous cervical abnormalities may need more frequent screening.
One of the benefits of an annual pap smear lies in its ability to detect pre-cancerous changes to the cervix and puts you one step ahead of fighting cervical cancer. The Associated Press article states, “[h]alf of women diagnosed with cervical cancer have never had a Pap, and another 10 percent haven't had one in five years.” So do Pap smears help? Statistics compiled by the American Cancer Society maintain that 11,270 new cases of cervical cancer will be diagnosed this year and 4,070 women will die from the disease.
As new studies and reports surface to the public, how does one take this newfound information? If the information is changing so rapidly, do we change our annual regimen? Or continue to check for pre-cancerous changes in our breasts and cervix with annual exams? Are we now being over cautious? These questions and more are sure to surface in the coming days and the officials will face a badgering from the public about their findings. It is imperative though, that we continue to ask these questions and push for answers.
Add a Comment1 Comments
Ummm excuse me, but my step mother died of ovarian cancer at the ripe old age of 52 years 11 months. She battled this for 4 years, but it was discovered during a routine exam by her physician. That routine exam was for the yearly pap she received where they also do the internal. She was already stage 4 and it was too late. Had she not gone to him for her yearly pap, she would have never known. Many of us who are limited based on our location in rural communities also have 2 separate physicians, one for internal med and on for the ob/gyn needs. What would have happened to her had she not had her yearly exams and she had waited 3 years as suggested???? She wouldn't have had 4 more years, and I wouldn't have been able to say goodbye to this one. We were given the gift of time. Not necessary my a$$. I'd love to know who this panel is made of, more men, or more women, and are they business people, or medical personnel?? Not needed every year BAH!!! Tell that to my father who lost his soulmate. He took her to every single yearly appointment. Does this mean insurance companies can now deny a yearly if you get them? Does this mean we will receive less care for our money?? It's time healthcare was about the people who need treatment as opposed to the companies we pay to insure ourselves.
November 20, 2009 - 9:46amThis Comment