Improved
6112 HealthChanged
3786 LivesSaved
3568 Lives0 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More
I’ve just read a Huffington Post article on the issues surrounding women’s health and what’s needed in health care reform. The author pointed to the fact that nearly one in five women lacks health insurance, and therefore delays care. The article, of course, is meant to draw the attention of the Obama administration to the plight of women just as we sit down to discuss reform.
Uninsured Americans are more likely not to comply with medication regimens, seek needed care, or incur further debt if they can possible help it. They are also more likely to take jobs they may not be suited for and don’t like, and hang on to these jobs “for dear life,” to use an old turn of phrase, just because of the medical benefits.
When they are laid off, they lose their insurance, and very often since they are heads of households, their children lose, too.
Trust me, this is not a woman’s problem, however. You can skew the statistics any way you like, but men have the same problem, and in this recession men are being laid off faster than women. Last month, 663,000 more people lost their jobs. I see them in every Blueprint for Survival workshop, and their first issue is always health insurance. And if it isn’t, I make sure to bring it up because it should be.
When this recession is over, we will be confronting a profoundly changed America. We may have different kinds of jobs in different kinds of companies. Who knows whether the very companies we want to create “green” jobs, most of which are small and innovative (and not rich) can afford to pay benefits? Why should they have to?
I worry about how much of what has trickled out about Obama’s reform plans still depends on the old industrial economy with its big companies (that are now going under because of their health insurance costs) and employer-sponsored benefits. Putting it back on the employer just won’t work anymore. Nor will mandating that unemployed people buy health insurance.
There’s no way I want the health care system nationalized. There’s no way I want people to stop making a living. But I do want health care made into a social enterprise, perhaps even with non-profit status. Remember when we had non-profit hospitals? Church-run hospitals? It wasn’t on the backs of the government, nor was it on the back of the employer.
The way insurance companies and drug companies have been profiting at the expense of their customers is insane and unsustainable, and is no better than the banks.
We’ve seen where greed got the banks. Greed has gotten the health care industry into the same “pickle.” Like the small community banks, we need small, non-profit community health centers. Wouldn’t that drive down the cost of health care? Can’t we treat it like a public utility?
Let’s at least discuss this — here, on Friendfeed, anywhere you want — and get some new ides on the table.
Add a Comment1 Comments
Awesome post, Francine! I would like to know the numbers behind your assertion that men are being laid off faster than women. I read an article recently that stated the opposite, so I'm a little confused. With women being what we call here at EmpowHer the "Chief Medical Officers" of their families, I do feel that the current state of our health care is a serious women's issue/problem.
April 17, 2009 - 10:28amThis Comment