Facebook Pixel

Comment Reply

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

I think I will name and shame an expert on here Dr Claire Sturge wrote in a fax before ever reading my medical notes or me having turned up and met her for a report for court. She is being investigated by the GMC , the other doctor Dr Wilkins has had 1 warning for doing reports without meeting the woman Miss P.

This is how good a reputation these experts have, they can label you with "intent "before they have met you or read your notes. Or in other words invite the other independent expert to join in the fishing trip for a personality disorder.
For anyone wanting to see this fax send me a e-mail it is up on my blog with all the fob off letters from various MP's and Caffcass who have shredded the file. It was never put before the court . It is disclosed on my blog scroll way down to find it .4th August 2004 to Patrick Persuko child's solicitor who is now a judge in Milton Keynes.
It reads I will be looking at her stomatoise disorder or abnormal illness behaviour... I presume Dr Wilkins is doing likewise?
They had to break the law first before they could sever the maternal bond between us.
I think this has failed as recently I saw a glimpse of my son , who was so delighted to see me.
What part of MSBP can you link to cancer ?
The doctor must be doing a paper on vulnerable people in society .
This is do able in secret court .
The paperwork is all over the internet as it went out using the Clayton ruling for legal advise.
If it goes the course for intent it should set a precedence in law they are using the Meddows case law to pull the reports from court it could even go public.

June 22, 2009 - 4:08am

Reply

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy