So many people push this practice in an attempt to justify the harm that has been done. The circ pushers somehow miss your point, that what is removed is erogenous tissue. This tissue has about 20000 nerve endings and it is the only way that men feel fine touch and stretch senstation in their penis.
Anonymous on February 4, 2010 - 4:08am, the persomn that thinks you should do more dresearch, is in denial.
It is certain that over time a cut mans glans gets desensitized (wearing clothes would otherwise be an issue).
The study that compare men and says the sensation is near the same looked at an erect penis and DID NOT CONSIDER the parts cut off by circumcision. What a sham.
If you look at the whole penis, the cut man has the scar as the most sensitive part and the natural man has those 20000 fine touch and strtech sensing nerves. The foreskin parts provide more pleasure than the glans during erection. When the penis is flacid, a natural penis has a more sensitive glans than a man cut as a baby. This is importnat as sensation when flacid facilitates erection.
How can anyone think changing the dynamics and removing the capacity for pleasure is a sexual positive?
Comment Reply
Thank you so much ffor this article.
So many people push this practice in an attempt to justify the harm that has been done. The circ pushers somehow miss your point, that what is removed is erogenous tissue. This tissue has about 20000 nerve endings and it is the only way that men feel fine touch and stretch senstation in their penis.
Anonymous on February 4, 2010 - 4:08am, the persomn that thinks you should do more dresearch, is in denial.
It is certain that over time a cut mans glans gets desensitized (wearing clothes would otherwise be an issue).
The study that compare men and says the sensation is near the same looked at an erect penis and DID NOT CONSIDER the parts cut off by circumcision. What a sham.
If you look at the whole penis, the cut man has the scar as the most sensitive part and the natural man has those 20000 fine touch and strtech sensing nerves. The foreskin parts provide more pleasure than the glans during erection. When the penis is flacid, a natural penis has a more sensitive glans than a man cut as a baby. This is importnat as sensation when flacid facilitates erection.
How can anyone think changing the dynamics and removing the capacity for pleasure is a sexual positive?
February 4, 2010 - 7:45amThis Comment
Reply