"You may be dismissive of my reasons but, frankly, my husband and I made the decision as we thought best at the time. I bet your parents did the same."
There are some fundamental problems with this concept..
INTENT has no bearing on the outcome--namely there is still a male with a damaged penis.
If a parent is going to choose to damage their son's penis, it should require more than BELIEFS in the myths, superstitions and urban myths to support it, it SHOULD require parents RESEARCH it and determine what REALLY is in HIS best interests.
This leads me to a critical question--what RESEARCH did you and your Husband do before choosing to do this to your son.. this is crucial, because from you posts it seems you deliberately CHOOSE not to even read the evidence posted to you.
Comment Reply
"You may be dismissive of my reasons but, frankly, my husband and I made the decision as we thought best at the time. I bet your parents did the same."
There are some fundamental problems with this concept..
INTENT has no bearing on the outcome--namely there is still a male with a damaged penis.
If a parent is going to choose to damage their son's penis, it should require more than BELIEFS in the myths, superstitions and urban myths to support it, it SHOULD require parents RESEARCH it and determine what REALLY is in HIS best interests.
This leads me to a critical question--what RESEARCH did you and your Husband do before choosing to do this to your son.. this is crucial, because from you posts it seems you deliberately CHOOSE not to even read the evidence posted to you.
March 24, 2010 - 10:58amThis Comment
Reply