Wow, Rosa. I don't want to blatantly offend you;
but I would recommend you polish your research
skills.
Wikipedia is a very credible source, especially in
detailed pages such as the "fasting" page.
It clearly states that the topic needs more credible
references--
but that statement was posted in June of 2008.
Based on the vast, detailed and excellently
cited information there (no fewer than 41 references
from medical studies, books and various written
accounts), you should well-believe Wiki's "fasting"
page presents very credible information. In fact,
I would surmise that page has been so developed
and scrutinized over the last 24 months, the statement
about credible references simply needs to be removed.
Maybe I'll do that this afternoon.
I wish you the best of luck.
Comment Reply
Wow, Rosa. I don't want to blatantly offend you;
April 25, 2010 - 12:07pmbut I would recommend you polish your research
skills.
Wikipedia is a very credible source, especially in
detailed pages such as the "fasting" page.
It clearly states that the topic needs more credible
references--
but that statement was posted in June of 2008.
Based on the vast, detailed and excellently
cited information there (no fewer than 41 references
from medical studies, books and various written
accounts), you should well-believe Wiki's "fasting"
page presents very credible information. In fact,
I would surmise that page has been so developed
and scrutinized over the last 24 months, the statement
about credible references simply needs to be removed.
Maybe I'll do that this afternoon.
I wish you the best of luck.
This Comment
Reply