Thanks, Pat. Yes, I do agree and there is lots of evidence to support not only the differences in perspectives but also the gaps. Leaving out the key participants - the ones who have the most to benefit does not make sense and it helps communications between all. I guess in this case and especially knowing his background, he must have I hope some rationale for not wishing to include a patient in the venue. Does no one understand why the reaction or has anyone actually spoken to him about his reasons? They may be very valid, but at the moment it seems unknown??
Comment Reply
Thanks, Pat. Yes, I do agree and there is lots of evidence to support not only the differences in perspectives but also the gaps. Leaving out the key participants - the ones who have the most to benefit does not make sense and it helps communications between all. I guess in this case and especially knowing his background, he must have I hope some rationale for not wishing to include a patient in the venue. Does no one understand why the reaction or has anyone actually spoken to him about his reasons? They may be very valid, but at the moment it seems unknown??
June 16, 2010 - 9:11pmThis Comment
Reply