There is significant evidence that women who have experienced sex with both intact and circumcised men prefer intact men for vaginal intercourse. See the O'Hara and O'Hara study discussed at www.cirp.org, the recent Frisch study from Denmark discussed at www.circumstitions.com, and the detailed, very graphic and explicit explanation at www.sexasnatureintendedit.com. Why would anyone think that removing part of a man's God and nature given equipment improve sex for women? Only American cultural bias could explain such a conclusion.
Comment Reply
There is significant evidence that women who have experienced sex with both intact and circumcised men prefer intact men for vaginal intercourse. See the O'Hara and O'Hara study discussed at www.cirp.org, the recent Frisch study from Denmark discussed at www.circumstitions.com, and the detailed, very graphic and explicit explanation at www.sexasnatureintendedit.com. Why would anyone think that removing part of a man's God and nature given equipment improve sex for women? Only American cultural bias could explain such a conclusion.
October 27, 2012 - 5:28pmThis Comment
Reply