Circumcision on an infant is absolutely mutilation. Look up the definition of the word. All claims of Health and hygiene benefits are based on pseudoscience - if you removed the entire penis you would have the most protection following their "logic". Also the foreskin is not just a flap of skin - it contains highly sensitive skin, multiple types of erotogenic tissues, arteries, blood vessels, and lymphatic systems. All in all the amputation removes close to 20,000 nerves (the clitoris has 8,000 nerves for comparison).
Your self-percieved "right" to circumcise your son denies his fundamental human right to an intact penis. Which at the age of consent he can choose to live the rest of his life intact or if he really wanted to he can circumcise himself.
Comment Reply
Circumcision on an infant is absolutely mutilation. Look up the definition of the word. All claims of Health and hygiene benefits are based on pseudoscience - if you removed the entire penis you would have the most protection following their "logic". Also the foreskin is not just a flap of skin - it contains highly sensitive skin, multiple types of erotogenic tissues, arteries, blood vessels, and lymphatic systems. All in all the amputation removes close to 20,000 nerves (the clitoris has 8,000 nerves for comparison).
Your self-percieved "right" to circumcise your son denies his fundamental human right to an intact penis. Which at the age of consent he can choose to live the rest of his life intact or if he really wanted to he can circumcise himself.
November 16, 2010 - 7:00amThis Comment
Reply