1. Joanne hasn't answered "every single one of these objections." She has waved her hands at a few, but not answered objections with evidence.
2. I'm not anonymous, I'm pseudonymous -- a different thing entirely.
3. Venomous? I looked through my responses. Nope, no venom, just calling Joanne on her inaccuracies and misstatements.
4. "who is paying them for the time it takes them to write such extensive posts." About 5 years ago I started collecting science-based refutations of anti-vaccine talking points. Joanne's arguments were so old, and so outdated, that all I had to do was to open that folder, select the appropriate responses, and post them. Didn't take much time at all.
5. I have no financial connections with any pharmaceutical companies or vaccine providers.
6. "I imagine something similar is happening here." Your imagination is quite lively, and quite wrong.
Comment Reply
For the record, Anonymous --
1. Joanne hasn't answered "every single one of these objections." She has waved her hands at a few, but not answered objections with evidence.
September 20, 2011 - 11:40am2. I'm not anonymous, I'm pseudonymous -- a different thing entirely.
3. Venomous? I looked through my responses. Nope, no venom, just calling Joanne on her inaccuracies and misstatements.
4. "who is paying them for the time it takes them to write such extensive posts." About 5 years ago I started collecting science-based refutations of anti-vaccine talking points. Joanne's arguments were so old, and so outdated, that all I had to do was to open that folder, select the appropriate responses, and post them. Didn't take much time at all.
5. I have no financial connections with any pharmaceutical companies or vaccine providers.
6. "I imagine something similar is happening here." Your imagination is quite lively, and quite wrong.
This Comment
Reply