In an earlier article in this series https://www.empowher.com/autism/content/autisms-theoretical-causes-genetics-and-metabolism-editorial?page=0,1 you wrote,
"So the neurologically normal babies who had been exposed to mercury in the womb via their mother’s fillings or anti-D injections, and after birth in the form of vaccines, had a higher level of mercury showing in their hair. Autistic babies exposed to the same things did not show this same level of mercury because they hadn’t excreted it from their bodies. (4)"
(4) Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children, International Journal of Toxicology. Web. 8 September 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
Yet in the current article you argue that "Mercury from maternal amalgam fillings leads to a significant increase of mercury concentration in the tissues and the hair of fetuses and newborn children."
So which is it to be? Are mercury levels high in hair and tissues or are they high in tissues and low in hair in accord with the "poor excretor" theory you referenced in the earlier article. Both cannot be simultaneously true. Where you wrong then or now?
Comment Reply
In an earlier article in this series https://www.empowher.com/autism/content/autisms-theoretical-causes-genetics-and-metabolism-editorial?page=0,1 you wrote,
"So the neurologically normal babies who had been exposed to mercury in the womb via their mother’s fillings or anti-D injections, and after birth in the form of vaccines, had a higher level of mercury showing in their hair. Autistic babies exposed to the same things did not show this same level of mercury because they hadn’t excreted it from their bodies. (4)"
(4) Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children, International Journal of Toxicology. Web. 8 September 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
Yet in the current article you argue that "Mercury from maternal amalgam fillings leads to a significant increase of mercury concentration in the tissues and the hair of fetuses and newborn children."
So which is it to be? Are mercury levels high in hair and tissues or are they high in tissues and low in hair in accord with the "poor excretor" theory you referenced in the earlier article. Both cannot be simultaneously true. Where you wrong then or now?
September 24, 2011 - 4:18pmThis Comment
Reply