Facebook Pixel

Comment Reply

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

I am an OB/GYN and Fellow of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FACOG). Yes, it could be argued that hysterectomy is indicated. However, your condition is only mildly dysplastic at this point. To go from mild dysplasia (CIN 1) to invasive cancer is a 20-30 year process. In fact studies show that on average, it takes 12 years to go from carcinoma in situ (CIN 3 where the full thickness of the mucosa (skin) of the cervix is involved with abnormal cells) to invasive cancer. Furthermore, different types of the HPV virus are more aggressive than others. The fact that you are 50 years old and only have mild dysplasia indicate that your particular virus may cause abnormalities but is somewhat wimpy in doing so. I doubt you have HPV types 16 or 18. IT WOULD BE COMPLETELY SAFE FOR YOU TO WAIT 6 MONTHS AND HAVE A REPEAT COLPOSCOPY AND FURTHER BIOPSIES IF INDICATED.

As far as surgical menopause, ACOG has moved away from recommending removing the ovaries at time of hysterectomy prophylactically (preventively). The thought used to be that this practice lowered the risk of getting ovarian cancer. It had been noted that 15% of individuals with ovarian cancer had previous pelvic surgery where the ovaries could be removed. Given that the risk of getting ovarian cancer is anywhere from 1:40 to 1:60 means that a whole lot of ovaries were removed unnecessarily. Recent studies this past decade have shown an improved lifespan, better bone density, lower cardiovascular risk and an overall improved sense of well being in women who had ovaries after menopause versus women who did not. We have found that even though the ovaries stop producing estrogen at the time of menopause, they continue production of testosterone. In fact, one of the modules we as OB/GYNs can go through in annual recertification has us look at our practice of prophylactic oophorectomy (remove ovaries) and change to more recent practice standards.

This information may be too little, too late but this is my personal take on current recommendations on practice standards of care per ACOG.

Gary N. Gregerson, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.

January 12, 2012 - 5:13am

Reply

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy