Since Shang violated basic principles by refusing to cite which studies he chose the entire meta-analysis wouldn't even make it acceptable as a first year student's homework assignment.
When you state "but remember those same writers were fine with the admission criteria before publication..." oh, please. Are you trying to say that Shang discussed his admission criteria with Dana Ullman and Peter Fisher?! You've gone from the sublime to the ridiculous. Now you're really fabricating.
You response is typical of pseudoskeptical groupie. And you're by far nowhere near in the same league as Mssrs. Ullman and Fisher.
The latest Swiss HTA debunks Shang and exposes his bias and misappropriation of funding in any event.
Comment Reply
Since Shang violated basic principles by refusing to cite which studies he chose the entire meta-analysis wouldn't even make it acceptable as a first year student's homework assignment.
January 20, 2012 - 1:15pmWhen you state "but remember those same writers were fine with the admission criteria before publication..." oh, please. Are you trying to say that Shang discussed his admission criteria with Dana Ullman and Peter Fisher?! You've gone from the sublime to the ridiculous. Now you're really fabricating.
You response is typical of pseudoskeptical groupie. And you're by far nowhere near in the same league as Mssrs. Ullman and Fisher.
The latest Swiss HTA debunks Shang and exposes his bias and misappropriation of funding in any event.
This Comment
Reply