Every one of the 110 studies is acknowledged, would you like the list?
I don't know who was consulted, Dana Ulman wouldn't be as he is no scientist, I have no information as to whether Dr Fisher was or not.
I was commenting on who welcomed the report based on it's criteria.
HTAs only comment on Shang is this quotation
“Although we cannot conclude from the previous remarks [about the Shang et al 2005 study] the opposite conclusion - that homeopathy is effective - we can say with certainty that the Shang et al 2005 study does not prove that homeopathy has no effect.”
That' a long way from debunking, but then you seem to have blinkers on so I expect that.
Shang doesn't claim to prove it has no effect. That's impossible. It claims that it's efficacy is unproven.
Comment Reply
Every one of the 110 studies is acknowledged, would you like the list?
I don't know who was consulted, Dana Ulman wouldn't be as he is no scientist, I have no information as to whether Dr Fisher was or not.
I was commenting on who welcomed the report based on it's criteria.
HTAs only comment on Shang is this quotation
“Although we cannot conclude from the previous remarks [about the Shang et al 2005 study] the opposite conclusion - that homeopathy is effective - we can say with certainty that the Shang et al 2005 study does not prove that homeopathy has no effect.”
That' a long way from debunking, but then you seem to have blinkers on so I expect that.
Shang doesn't claim to prove it has no effect. That's impossible. It claims that it's efficacy is unproven.
January 20, 2012 - 1:51pmThis Comment
Reply