Anyone who claims that Homeopathy contradicts science misses the point that medicine is NOT science, it's health care technology. Since your first premise is false your entire argument is false. The fact that Homeopathy cures where other means obviously don't is proof enough for those who've used it. Trust/faith/belief has little to do with it other than your emotional appeal.
Further, your opinion that any claims to the effectiveness of Homeopathy are "bold" is another deceptive value judgment on your part, insisting that there be a double standard of "robust" evidence is another deception, along with your other value judgments about the quality of the trials.
Your entire argument is false, misleading and deceptive.
Medicine is not science, science is not philosophy, and only pseudoskeptics make the mistake of confusing them.
Find another hobby.
Comment Reply
Anyone who claims that Homeopathy contradicts science misses the point that medicine is NOT science, it's health care technology. Since your first premise is false your entire argument is false. The fact that Homeopathy cures where other means obviously don't is proof enough for those who've used it. Trust/faith/belief has little to do with it other than your emotional appeal.
February 13, 2012 - 7:40amFurther, your opinion that any claims to the effectiveness of Homeopathy are "bold" is another deceptive value judgment on your part, insisting that there be a double standard of "robust" evidence is another deception, along with your other value judgments about the quality of the trials.
Your entire argument is false, misleading and deceptive.
Medicine is not science, science is not philosophy, and only pseudoskeptics make the mistake of confusing them.
Find another hobby.
This Comment
Reply