I like that they at least acknowledged male-factor infertility, but i wish they would have elaborated in that side of it, too. Far too many women go through the huge series of tests, come up with nothing, THEN send the male in for his exam/semen analysis. I feel that if more emphasis were placed on the male-factor (because it is equally frequent), then it would save people a great deal of time, money, and procedures (and let's face it, a semen analysis isn't as bad as all of the tests women have to go through...) and I dont necessarily think that recommending Stork is the best idea, given that the author has no idea what the individual circumstances are for each individual reader. There are a LOT of products that claim to help improve fertility, it just sounds like the author has been paid by the manufacturer to promote this product, which is not ok given the nature of this article.
Comment Reply
I like that they at least acknowledged male-factor infertility, but i wish they would have elaborated in that side of it, too. Far too many women go through the huge series of tests, come up with nothing, THEN send the male in for his exam/semen analysis. I feel that if more emphasis were placed on the male-factor (because it is equally frequent), then it would save people a great deal of time, money, and procedures (and let's face it, a semen analysis isn't as bad as all of the tests women have to go through...) and I dont necessarily think that recommending Stork is the best idea, given that the author has no idea what the individual circumstances are for each individual reader. There are a LOT of products that claim to help improve fertility, it just sounds like the author has been paid by the manufacturer to promote this product, which is not ok given the nature of this article.
August 15, 2015 - 3:14pmThis Comment
Reply