Intactivists can be kinda sensitive, they are single issue driven. FYI, the reason that sex with uncircumcised guys seldom needs lube isn't because their penises are "glossier," it is because the extra skin glides up and down the penis shaft, acting like a lateral bearing, resulting in far less skin on skin friction (the penis shaft moves freely up and down, while the penis skin itself needs to move much less in the vagina). With circumcised guys they is much less skin and glide, so lube is needed, as their penises act more like a metal piston in the vagina.
Nature evolved foreskins on all male mammals for a reason, it provides decernable reproductive advantages -- ease in intercourse and more pleasure, among them. If it didn't, males wouldn't be born with them. The fact that Man can reproduce without one is a testiment to his adaptabilty, not proof that nature got it wrong on a broad scale.
Comment Reply
MC,
Intactivists can be kinda sensitive, they are single issue driven. FYI, the reason that sex with uncircumcised guys seldom needs lube isn't because their penises are "glossier," it is because the extra skin glides up and down the penis shaft, acting like a lateral bearing, resulting in far less skin on skin friction (the penis shaft moves freely up and down, while the penis skin itself needs to move much less in the vagina). With circumcised guys they is much less skin and glide, so lube is needed, as their penises act more like a metal piston in the vagina.
Nature evolved foreskins on all male mammals for a reason, it provides decernable reproductive advantages -- ease in intercourse and more pleasure, among them. If it didn't, males wouldn't be born with them. The fact that Man can reproduce without one is a testiment to his adaptabilty, not proof that nature got it wrong on a broad scale.
November 10, 2015 - 10:52amThis Comment
Reply