Five Ways To Prevent Cancer

Thimerosal is not chemically irelevant otherwise Merck wouldn't have stated in their document I just showed you that it is very toxic and may be lethal even in small amounts. The governments wouldn't have removed the majority of thimerosal from childhood vaccines if it was irelevant.

I personally wouldn't endorse information by Paul Offit because he holds the patent for Prevnar vaccination and makes a lot of money from vaccinations. Anyone who advises on vaccines who also sits on the board of a drug company or holds a patent of a vaccine is not unbiased. And yes they do make billions from vaccines. For instance, in a reuters article about hib vaccine, they state:

'Japan is the world's third largest vaccine market valued at $640 million and is expected to grow further.'

http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/idUSLQ36267720090526

Of course they make profit from it. No drug company is going to make a drug they cannot profit from.

And none of that changes the fact that every manufacturer states on their data sheet (which you can get with the vaccine) that no vaccines have ever been tested for their carcinogenic potential, which was actually the issue my article addressed, and so when they say vaccines are safe they can't really say that with any accuracy because they haven't studied whether they cause cancer, affect fertility or mutate into other illnesses.

It's not about being pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine or whatever label you'd like to put on it, it's about being informed of all the issues so that if a person decides to get a vaccine they at least gave full informed consent. Withholding manufacturer information on lack of cancer studies etc does not equate to informed consent.

And yes, I do have experience of the diseases. I had meningitis at 4 years old. I also had chickenpox and mumps and rubella which are now 'vaccine preventable' diseases. My MIL had measles, my first daughter had measles (she is now 13 and fine), I've had two other daughters with mumps and whooping cough and all 4 with chickenpox. My FIL died of pneumonia (which occured after 2 flu vaccinations).

If you look at the death stats for measles in the UK between 1940-2007, you will see that they state:

'In 2006 there was one measles death in a 13 years old male who had an underlying lung condition and was taking immunosuppressive drugs. Prior to 2006, the last death from acute measles was in 1992.

Other measles deaths shown above are in older individuals and were caused by the late effects of measles. These infections were acquired during the 1980s or earlier, when epidemics of measles occurred.'

So apart from 1 death in 1992 and 1 death which was actually due to immune-suppression and lung disease, all measles deaths since 1940 were in 'older' people, i.e. teens and adults when the disease is more serious, so we are in effect vaccinating to protect adults from getting measles, rather than babies and children.

http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1195733835814?p=1191942172799

Since my article was about cancer, I think the place for an indepth vaccine debate is not here, but if you want to email me directly, please do so.

Regarding Thimerasol in vaccines, please read:
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228

Firstly, there IS a way to post your name on here, as others have done it.

If I was the type to censor your remarks, 'freespeaker', I would have deleted them. By all means, put me on your blog :)

Secondly, thimerosal IS 50% mercury and it is dangerous.

See here:

http://www.vce.org/mercury/thimerosal-usp.pdf

This says:

''HAZARD SYMBOL T+ (VERY TOXIC). Criteria: Inhalation, swallowing or absorbtion through the skin in very small amounts can cause considerable damage to health and may sometimes be lethal.'

This is written by Merck, who MAKE the vaccines and since they are vaccinologists and spend their whole career making vaccines, I presume they know more about it than you do.

It is also the reason why thimerosal has been removed from infant teething powders and the majority of childhood vaccines (except for Hep B and flu jabs) and why mercury fillings are no longer recommended for pregnant women and warnings have been issued on fish consumption.

As for formaldehyde, according to the US government, the occupational safety and health administration, formaldehyde is:
'"reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen"

See: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/formaldehyde/index.html

They state concern over formaldehyde in DIY products like paints, ply-wood and textiles so there is no reason to assume then that formaldehyde would be safe in vaccines.

Of course if you think the government are wrong, by all means challenge them.

There have been news reports recently of concern being raised about 'cancer causing' formaldehyde in baby products:

http://safecosmetics.live2.radicaldesigns.org/article.php?id=414

Aluminium is known to cause dementia conditions and potentially to breast cancer (due to aluminium in anti-perspirants). The Institute of Medicine said in their book, 'The adverse effects of Pertussis and Rubella vaccines', that:

'Interest has developed recently in the potential health effects of aluminum, particularly in the setting of chronic renal failure, in which aluminum is not excreted from the body normally (Alfrey, 1984; Monteagudo et al., 1989). A severe, often fatal encephalopathy found in patients undergoing long-term dialysis was attributed to aluminum deposition in the brain (Alfrey et al., 1976). Reduction of aluminum in dialysate has largely eliminated this condition, but dialysis patients may still have subtle psychomotor defects that may be due to aluminum toxicity (Altmann et al., 1989). Animal studies have shown that aluminum can increase the rate of transmembrane diffusion across the blood—brain barrier (Banks and Kastin, 1989), which could possibly permit greater access of toxins to the brain.

You can read this book here:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1815&page=347

Now of course if you think the Institute of Medicine are wrong too, contact them. They didn't make up the research.

I didn't suggest in my article that vaccines are solely responsible for causing cancer. But there is evidence to suggest, merely from their composition that they are one possible cause in a list of many causes, and since the manufacturer's of these vaccines all state that they haven't been evaluated for their carcinogenic properties, this should be investigated.

Just another note, there is no way to post here, other than by posting as anonymous. IOW, you set up people who post here so you can whine they are posting anonymously.

BTW, if you do not post my comments, they wind up on my blog, with my special brand of contempt thrown in. And, I will not post your comments, since you advocate censorship.

FreeSpeaker

When I read articles like this and find something utterly stupid and not supported by evidence, I know I am dealing with a screwball. You made the claim: "Vaccines also contain cancer causing agents like formaldehyde, aluminium, thimerosal (a 50% mercury compound)..."

First, did you ever take, and stay awake during, high school chemistry? Doubtful. The fact that the one mercury atom in a molecule of thimerosal comprises 50% of the molecular weight, is utterly meaningless. For example, NaCl is comprised of two highly toxic atoms, but, it is commonly ingested by billions of people.

Second, formaldehyde is a typical by-product of metabolism, and you get far more of it from eating one piece of fruit than in the full course of childhood vaccinations.

Third, people consume aluminum in many forms, since aluminum is ubiquitous.

Fourth, I am quite familiar with Thimerosal, and, there is no evidence in any of a dozen MSDS that claims it is carcinogenic.

Sadly, there are people who hired you to spread disinformation. And, do not whine that I am posting annonymously, since I have included my email address to get notice of follow-ups. Also, you can find me at my blog, www.age-of-ignorance.blogspot.com.

All references are from 'scientifically' based sources. If you have an issue, put your name. There's nothing worse than trolls on the internet who wish to start arguments but don't put their name to their complaint.