As if we need more sniping about working mothers and those who stay home! The life and career of Sarah Palin is certainly bringing the so-called 'mommy wars' to the forefront yet again.
And so is a study that came out yesterday, that may have you scratching your head.
The study states that kids in a higher up socio-economic status fare worse in cognitive testing and end up fatter that poorer kids whose mothers work.
In a nutshell, this study showed that "kids from high-socioeconomic-status families take a long-term hit when their moms work outside the home—at ages 10 and 11, they perform more poorly on cognitive tests and are also more likely to be overweight than those whose high-status mothers leave the workforce. Children from low-status families, on the other hand, don't seem to suffer as much when their moms work. In fact, many of them do better on the same tests, and they're more fit, than similarly disadvantaged kids with stay-at-home moms.
The study, published in the journal Labour Economics, divided women into two socioeconomic groups, based on several variables (including education levels, income prior to pregnancy, ethnicity and whether a spouse was present at home). The kids from families in the "lower" group generally fared fine if their moms worked for the majority of their childhoods—at ages 10 and 11, they either scored about the same on cognitive tests, or better, than disadvantaged kids whose mothers stayed home. For kids from high-status families, though, the pattern flipped. The more these affluent moms worked—especially if they went back to their jobs while their children were still very young—the less well their kids did on cognitive tests later in childhood. (The high-status children with working moms still did better overall than all the low-status children—so class, not employment, was ultimately the stronger factor in their well-being.)
Why do mothers' choices have such different effects on kids, depending on their socioeconomic situations? Most likely, says Ruhm, the low-status kids get more intellectual stimulation in day care or with other caretakers, such as grandparents, than they do at home. Meanwhile, the high-status kids may find day care less enriching than being with their highly educated mothers. When these moms go back to work, "you're pulling the [high-status] kids out of these really good home environments," says Ruhm, "and a lot of the alternatives just aren't as good."
The same pattern was true of weight: low-status kids weren't any thinner or fatter depending on what their mothers did, but high-status kids with working moms did have a slightly higher risk of being overweight at 10 or 11. The biggest effect on weight came when mothers were working during their high-status children's school years. Maybe, says Ruhm, these moms didn't have time to cook healthy dinners and after-school snacks: "If you're working a lot and you're eating out and buying fatty food, that could have an effect on obesity later in the child's life." Or maybe those kids were left unsupervised more often, and thus had more opportunities to eat cookies in front of the TV—and fewer opportunities to run around outside. "Parents who are working but want to make sure their kids are supervised and safe will often load up the house with sedentary activities, since they can't always be there to take them to sports or to the park," says Karen Eifler, an associate professor of education at the University of Portland. "Their kids are more likely to have a TV or computer and videogames in their room—and also, the higher your economic status, the more likely you are to have those three machines in your house."
http://www.newsweek.com/id/158462
The article goes on to reassure all mothers that there are other studies to show that the opposite of THIS study has also found to be true. Well, that's reassuring! A bit like that old adage "statistics prove that statistics prove nothing..."
Tell Us
What do you make of these findings? Do you think kids of less educated parents are better off in daycare where they may learn more, and kids of educated mothers are better off home with her? Have you noticed differences between kids who stay home and those who attend daycare?
All user-generated information on this site is the opinion of its author only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions. Members and guests are responsible for their own posts and the potential consequences of those posts detailed in our Terms of Service.
Add a Comment2 Comments
Emphasis on "sure there can be..." - there was no generalization. It's a bona fide observation that I've made over the years. I've dealt with hundreds of kids in Scouting and other programs and have seen just about every situation there could be across the social "classes." The lack of acceptable social skills and good manners was, and still is, atrocious. Too many kids don't even know how to send thank you notes for gifts received on birthdays or holidays, and those are skills they're supposed to learn from their parents (who also lack basic etiquette).
It's great you turned out wonderful!
I can't say the same for a lot of stay-at-home kids around our neck of the woods - and this is an affluent neighborhood (how many high school kids do you know who get a Mercedes or BMW when they get their driver's license?). Now, don't get me started on latch-key kids - yikes! My house was the designated safe house on the block for latch key kids, so this is another situation I've had firsthand experience with.
September 15, 2008 - 4:49pmThis Comment
I know kids who grew up with single moms and fared better in school than their more financially advantaged counterparts. The single moms had to work harder to keep everything together for their families, whereas the more advantaged moms took everything for granted - including their kids.
I wouldn't generalize about daycare; not all daycare centers are alike with like equipment and advantages.
As for the differences between kids who go to daycare and those who stay home with mom, sure there can be differences, even significant differences. How about lack of social skills, for one, or the ability to share, for another. Kids need to be with other kids.
September 12, 2008 - 6:58pmThis Comment