"I enquired about the whether sex was better with or without a foreskin and he said better without."
Of course. He had to defend what he had done. That's normal but not a reason to circumcise a child. In Sweden, only 1 of 17,000 males go to their graves without their foreskins.
"but in this case the facts show otherwise."
Yes, maybe but we don't know if it is true or not. He could have had a frenenectomy which would resolve the problem. Why did he decide to go to the extreme?
Comment Reply
"I enquired about the whether sex was better with or without a foreskin and he said better without."
Of course. He had to defend what he had done. That's normal but not a reason to circumcise a child. In Sweden, only 1 of 17,000 males go to their graves without their foreskins.
"but in this case the facts show otherwise."
Yes, maybe but we don't know if it is true or not. He could have had a frenenectomy which would resolve the problem. Why did he decide to go to the extreme?
April 16, 2012 - 5:42pmThis Comment
Reply