hello.
although as i hv already discussed b4 that i hv a problem of hypothyroid but by regular medication (thyroxine) my TSH level is sufficiently undercontroled since last more than 4 years...so far as my hubby is concern he dont hv any other physical problem than the prostrate alone...
but when his semen analysis (detailed)report came ...according 2 "the physical analysis" his total count was 50mill/ml (the normal range is 20 mill/ml), live count sperm per ejaculate was 09mill/ml for 99millions of a single ejaculation (the normal range is 40 mill/ejaculate), percentage motile sperm was 18% but the rapid linear progression was zero (the normal range is 25% ), 25% were in slow/non-linear progression while the rest 75% were non progressive...
on the other side "the morphological analysis" depicted that only 10% of sperms were in normal form, 05% were large oval, 05% were small oval, 40% were tapering, 20% were duplicate/double & bent headed, 10% were amorphous & 10% were hving the mid piece abnormality...
by looking @ the above mentioned report (almost 4 yrs back) my doctor was a bit doubtfull about my hubby's fertility ...but (without any medical treatment) by the very next month i had a healthy conception that resulted in form of my cute little angel (a healthy daughter).... & after almost 2 yrs of my daughter's birth when i tend 2 xtend my family further, suffered from 2 consecutive misscarriages (due 2 lack of cardiac activity) .... therefore i m very much curious 2 know the actual factor behind that....
Comment Reply
hello.
May 14, 2010 - 7:38amalthough as i hv already discussed b4 that i hv a problem of hypothyroid but by regular medication (thyroxine) my TSH level is sufficiently undercontroled since last more than 4 years...so far as my hubby is concern he dont hv any other physical problem than the prostrate alone...
but when his semen analysis (detailed)report came ...according 2 "the physical analysis" his total count was 50mill/ml (the normal range is 20 mill/ml), live count sperm per ejaculate was 09mill/ml for 99millions of a single ejaculation (the normal range is 40 mill/ejaculate), percentage motile sperm was 18% but the rapid linear progression was zero (the normal range is 25% ), 25% were in slow/non-linear progression while the rest 75% were non progressive...
on the other side "the morphological analysis" depicted that only 10% of sperms were in normal form, 05% were large oval, 05% were small oval, 40% were tapering, 20% were duplicate/double & bent headed, 10% were amorphous & 10% were hving the mid piece abnormality...
by looking @ the above mentioned report (almost 4 yrs back) my doctor was a bit doubtfull about my hubby's fertility ...but (without any medical treatment) by the very next month i had a healthy conception that resulted in form of my cute little angel (a healthy daughter).... & after almost 2 yrs of my daughter's birth when i tend 2 xtend my family further, suffered from 2 consecutive misscarriages (due 2 lack of cardiac activity) .... therefore i m very much curious 2 know the actual factor behind that....
This Comment
Reply