Oh really? What if you decided to kill your child? Would anyone have a right to prevent that? How is this different. What you advocate is body modification through mutilation of the penis. I happen to think it is wrong to allow you to do that at your whim. There is and never has been a legitimate reason for removing the male foreskin. Each and every excuse ever given eventually was exposed as a scam. The only reason the practice still exists in America is the tremendous amount of revenue it generates, not only in fees charged, but in the trafficking of babies' foreskins for use in the cosmetic industry.
No sir, you don't have a right to remove healthy and functional tissue from your son. In doing so, you are violating his God given right to an intact body. You are very shallow in thinking that you own him. Children are not chattel.
Comment Reply
Oh really? What if you decided to kill your child? Would anyone have a right to prevent that? How is this different. What you advocate is body modification through mutilation of the penis. I happen to think it is wrong to allow you to do that at your whim. There is and never has been a legitimate reason for removing the male foreskin. Each and every excuse ever given eventually was exposed as a scam. The only reason the practice still exists in America is the tremendous amount of revenue it generates, not only in fees charged, but in the trafficking of babies' foreskins for use in the cosmetic industry.
No sir, you don't have a right to remove healthy and functional tissue from your son. In doing so, you are violating his God given right to an intact body. You are very shallow in thinking that you own him. Children are not chattel.
April 11, 2011 - 12:09pmThis Comment
Reply