Facebook Pixel

DNA Vaccines for Flu and AIDS

Rate This

Production of flu shots for H1N1 lagged far behind schedule because the viruses didn't grow as fast as expected.

“They don't grow any faster if you yell at them!” as one spokesman said. It takes months to produce a batch of flu shots, so the manufacturers have to guess which strains are going to be prevalent in each year's seasonal flu outbreaks. Exceptional strains, such as the H1N1 (swine) flu and the H5N1 (bird) flu variants, create special challenges because the flu can spread so widely before vaccines are ready for mass distribution.

That's one motivation for DNA vaccines. Viruses are unable to reproduce outside of living cells, and they are much too complicated for conventional chemical synthesis. However, the immune system does not require the entire virus particle in order to produce antibodies against it. Proteins are the primary targets of the white blood cells that recognize foreign invaders. Viruses typically come with a protein coat that can be identified and attacked.

Researchers have developed techniques to produce tiny loops of DNA, called plasmids, containing one or more genes coding for specific proteins. Under favorable conditions, these plasmids can enter cells of humans or animals and cause the cells to produce a viral protein. That protein is then released from the cell and flagged by the immune system. Thus, a DNA plasmid vaccine can immunize the patient with just the protein coat from a virus, which is produced by the patient's own cells.

Live virus vaccines carry some risk of infecting the patient, if the live virus is not sufficiently weakened. DNA plasmid vaccines eliminate this possibility completely. In addition, the plasmids themselves do not induce an immune response.

There are many technical challenges to this approach. Plasmid HIV vaccines so far have been unsuccessful because of low efficiencies in getting the plamids into the cells, and low rates of viral protein production. A study called the STEP trial was halted in summer 2009 because the vaccine appeared to paradoxically increase the risk of HIV infection, compared to the placebo group.

Add a CommentComments

There are no comments yet. Be the first one and get the conversation started!

Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.


Get Email Updates

Flu Guide

Have a question? We're here to help. Ask the Community.


Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!