Hide This

FREEHER HealthToolkit

HER Health Toolkit

Sign up for EmpowHER updates and you'll receive our
FREE HER Health Toolkit

Sex & Relationships

Get Email Updates

Sex & Relationships Guide

Susan Cody HERWriter Guide

Have a question? We're here to help. Ask the Community.

ASK

Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!

Uncircumcised Men and Their Partners

By Aimee Boyle
 
Rate This

There is an understandable sense of urgency and haste to find a solution to the HIV pandemic and this haste may take the place of real scientific evidence of circumcision and its health benefits.

This may mean that ethical concerns are given less importance and focus. Such haste may also obscure the need to be attentive to local cultural sensitivities, which vary from one African region to another, in formulating policy concerning circumcision.

In the West, many people feel that the circumcised penis is more aesthetically pleasing, more attractive and "cleaner" looking. These views can tend toward discrimination against men and boys with uncircumcised penises and much of the attitudes presented toward the health issues facing uncircumcised men and boys may stem more from this bias than from any real evidence on the subject.

There are those who claim greater sexual satisfaction both visually and physically with circumcised penises but this is a subjective view and not to be confused with actual fact.

With proper hygiene practices, boys can learn to take care of themselves and avoid any troubles with their uncircumcised penises, so the worry over cleanliness and infection is greatly overexaggerated in many instances.

Sources:

Indications for Circumcision. Retrieved from the internet on February 2, 2012
http://www.circinfo.com/guide_to_decision/indications.html

Medical Studies on Circumcision
Circumcision Resource Center
Retrieved from the internet on February 2, 2012
http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Aimee Boyle is a regular contributor to EmpowHER

Reviewed February 2, 2012
by Michele Blacksberg RN
Edited by Jody Smith

Add a Comment4 Comments

John Galt

arian,
first I'm assuming you're reference to...if this is english "my point of view it is good be circumciseed be comtaminated to HIV Virus?" is refering to the WHO study. It's flawed beyond words. "Current evidence shows no role for circumcision in preventing HIV transmission in industrialized parts of the world [61,62] or in reducing the male-to-female transmission of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. [63] Actually, there are reports of increased risk of HIV transmission during circumcision in resource-poor countries.[64] However, randomized trials [6] have shown that circumcision carried out with appropriate surgical techniques and sterilization procedures may reduce the female-to-male transmission of HIV in Africa. The WHO strategic plan for sexual and reproductive health during 2010–15 includes ‘support to countries to monitor the quality and acceptability of male circumcision
services as they expand in the African Region and elsewhere’ as well as research ‘to assess the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of medical devices to facilitate expansion of male circumcision
services’. [65]"
Secondly "but i proud to say that Great Islam had already order to circumcise." You may want to read this: http://www.quranicpath.com/misconceptions/circumcision.html

Maybe you proud to say you learned something today, who knows?

February 9, 2012 - 7:45pm
arian

OK, it is humanity and community to order people to circumcise masculine gender and to my point of view it is good be circumcised be contaminated to HIV Virus, but i proud to say that Great Islam had already order to circumcise.

Thanks

February 5, 2012 - 10:55pm
EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

John, I completely agree with you in every way which is why I didn't circumcise my two sons. It's amazing to me how much misinformation is spread about how "dirty" men and boys who have not been circumcised are or can be. Why would they be any dirtier? It's as if we're saying we should cut the earlobes off of infants at birth because they'll hear better if we do ( I always give this analogy when I talk about it ) and yes, I agree completely, the double standard is DISGUSTING feminist groups would be bashing in the doors of hospitals if this were happening to infant girls in the Western industrialized countries. Thanks so much for your comments.

February 4, 2012 - 2:26pm
John Galt

For those who support male genital mutilation I would ask three questions.
First: Would we accept female genital mutilation if it could be shown to decrease the risk of HIV?
Second: Would we accept female genital mutilation if for some reason many people found it more aesthetically pleasing?
Third: Would it be acceptable to perform FGM on infants because we know that they would not remember the experience?
Circumcision is a barbaric practice which needs to be outlawed. It’s child abuse of the highest order and should be viewed as such.

February 3, 2012 - 11:10am
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Improved

1631 Health

Changed

607 Lives

Saved

455 Lives
1 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Take Our Featured Health Poll

Need Your Feedback! What health topics would you like to see covered more on EmpowHER.com?:
View Results