Hide This

FREEHER HealthToolkit

HER Health Toolkit

Sign up for EmpowHER updates and you'll receive our
FREE HER Health Toolkit

Wellness

Get Email Updates

Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!

Your "Must Have" Annual Health Tests

By Michelle King Robson Expert HERWriter
 
Rate This
Your "Must Have" Annual Health Tests 0 5
what are your 'must have' health tests?
Lev Dolgachov/PhotoSpin

Are you up to date on all your tests? Do you even know what tests women in your age group should get? I’d bet most women would have to say no to both questions. That’s a real problem in my book!

That’s also why I talked to my friend and colleague Pam Peeke, MD to find out what women should think about in their 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s. Here’s what she told me.

Twenties

You may feel too young to worry about health issues, but this is the perfect time to get your baseline readings for all critical tests. Baseline means it’s the starting point. It shows where your body is at when you are young and presumably in your best health. As you get older, these tests results will be incredibly valuable as a comparison if anything starts to go wrong. That’s why every woman should have a complete physical by age 21. Here’s what you need for blood tests:

Cholesterol tests

Liver/Kidney function tests

Blood sugar tests

Thyroid level tests

Vitamin level tests – especially vitamins D and B12

In addition, every women should also have these physical exams:

Gynecological tests - Get a baseline Pap test and tests for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Dr. Peeke says that more than 19 million people are diagnosed with STDs and over half of them are between the ages of 15 and 24. Make sure you get tested for HPV – it’s a leading cause of cervical cancer.

Skin exam tests – Melanoma is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women ages 25-29. So don’t forget to schedule time for a visual exam of your skin to check for abnormal growths that could be the start of skin cancer.

Weight tests – No matter what your body type is – thin, athletic or full – write down your waist size, weight and body mass index (BMI) and keep it as a baseline measure. These numbers will be important to track as you get older.

Thirties

Dr. Peeke says that women in this age group should repeat everything they had done in their 20s, with some additions.

Add a Comment2 Comments

Rima E Laibow MD

Dr. Pam did a pretty good job on most of these items, but there are several serious, one might say, glaring, errors that could damage women's health in major ways.
Let's start with mammograms: they under diagnose breast cancer AND over diagnose it. That is to say, 30% of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) is missed by mammograms (false negative), another 30% is diagnosed when it is absent (false positive) for an accuracy rate of 40%. Not only that, the process itself is harmful since both the radiation and compression can damage tissue.
The harm from a false negative is obvious. The harm from a false positive, highlighted recently in an article in the British Medical Journal (Possible Net Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Updated Modelling of Forrest Report, British Medical Journal, December 8, 2011: 343; d7627) comes about through lumpectomies, mastectomies and other unnecessary interventions such as chemotherapy and radiation.
Just how good is the diagnostic acumen of pathologists after a mammogram shows DCIS? Not very.
Despite what most people believe, there simply are no diagnostic standards for D.C.I.S. Even if there were such standards, there are no requirements that the pathologists doing the readings have specialized expertise or training in this area.
Shahla Masood, MD, is the head of pathology at the University of Florida College of Medicine in Jacksonville. She told the New York Times: "There are studies that show that diagnosing these borderline breast lesions occasionally comes down to the flip of a coin."

Hmm. I want to bet my life on the flip of a pathologist's coin and I'll bet you do, too!

As if that were not bad enough, it turns out that the pre-menopausal breast is particularly sensitive to radiation so that " each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade's screening." according to renowned environmental physician, Dr. Samuel Epstein.

Actually, it is worse than that: mammograms, despite the super pink ribbons on everything hype, do very little, perhaps nothing at all, to save the lives of the people who get them: "A 10 percent reduction [in death from breast cancer - Dr. Rima] would mean that if 1,000 50-year-old women were screened over a decade, 996 women rather than 995.6 would not die from the cancer — an effect so tiny it may have occurred by chance." according to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (New England Journal of Medicine September 23, 2010; 363(13):1203-10).

Dr. Charles B. Simone, who was a clinical associate in immunology and pharmacology at the National Cancer Institute, says,
"Mammograms increase the risk for developing breast cancer and raise the risk of spreading or metastasizing an existing growth."
Thermography, which detects the heat that a tumor generates (tumors have increased blood flow and metabolic rates compared to normal tissue) on the other hand, accurately identifies cancers years before they become apparent on any other visualization or test. It is safe, inexpensive, quick and accurate. Obviously a good choice if health is the issue, but not if billable services is the point of the exercise.
Diet, exercise, self-examination and high antioxidant intake are vital to prevention of cancer, breast or otherwise. It would be far wiser to have a discussion with your patient, Dr. Pam, about these issues than to write a prescription for a mammogram.

Second, the cholesterol screening is absurd. A very small percentage of people actually have high cholesterol. What they do have is high oxidative stress (free radical damage) plus artificially lowered cholesterol standards.
Dr. Pam, you would be well advised to go back to biochemistry and review where cholesterol comes from and what it does in the body. Drug companies have a huge, and totally disingenuous, interest in making sure that more people, and ever more people, take cholesterol-lowering drugs.
First of all, they are block buster money producers. Second of all, they lead to a great many other problems, all of which lead then to the consumption of more, and ever more, medical services and drugs.
For example, every sex hormone is built on a cholesterol scaffold: lower cholesterol and you have just guaranteed the sale of a great deal of medication designed to compensate, for example, in men, for erectile dysfunction and in women, in hormone replacement therapy.
Not only that, lowering cholesterol, which comprises more than 50% of the brain by weight, will result in depression and other emotional and mental illnesses: more drug bounty! And, as we know, once people get on the psychoactive medication drug merry-go-round, they usually stay on it for the rest of their lives. Mmmmm! MMMMoney!
Wait! There's more! The body actually produces cholesterol for a reason: it acts as a bandage when damage occurs to the living of the walls of the arteries so if the body is making a lot of it, there is probably a need for it. Why not treat that instead of damaging an essential response mechanism that the body is using to protect and heal itself? Well, because that takes time, which doctors have allowed to be ripped from them by agreeing to practice medicine the same way that you build a car: in tiny, disconnected segments, without adequate time to know, and care for, their patients.
The drug companies have been deeply instrumental in artificially and nonsensically lowering "normal" cholesterol levels. Why? so they can sell drugs to younger and therefore more, people, now to include children as young as eight years.
No, Dr. Pam, the issue is not cholesterol level. It is antioxidant level and chronic inflammation.
All of these conditions can be first prevented and then treated with nutrients, life style alterations and detoxification. All of them.
I know, because I have been doing that in my drug-free practice of medicine and psychiatry for more than 40 years as a licensed physician.
Oh, and high quality vitamins and mineral supplements are essential, since they are deficient in modern foods and make believe, processed and poisoned PHUDES. These dangerous imitation pseudo-nutrients are the product of industrial production and are seriously toxic.
How about discussing that with your patients, Dr. Pam?
I do.
Oh, yes, although it was not mentioned in the article, if you are interested in your patient's well-being as they move through the life cycle, Dr. Pam, I advise you to advise your patients that any vaccine will weaken their immune systems and, in fact, shots like the flu shot, which contains aluminum as well as mercury, will increase their chances of developing neuro degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's Disease by hundreds of percentage points for each time they get vaccinated.
You might also want to be sure to advise against such absurdities as the shingles (Herpes zoster) vaccine which, according to the CDC, seriously harms 1 patient for each 2.8 patients vaccinated with it and does not work in something like, again, according to the CDC, 98-99% of cases.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
Facebook: /NaturalSolutionsFoundation
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com
www.GDS-Therapy.com

May 15, 2014 - 7:33pm
EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

I would like to emphasis on the rates of teens and young adults( under 25) getting STD's. The numbers are growing, especially those with chlamydia and herpes. It is really important for schools to provide sex education as a form of intervention. Having an STD affects your life in significant ways. For example your social life. The fear people have to date, the anxiety of telling someone with whom it seems to be serious that they have an STD. I'm really glad that there are websites such as PositiveSingle to help, knowing most of the people in the group age I mentioned spend a lot of their time online.

May 13, 2014 - 8:34pm
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Improved

1710 Health

Changed

643 Lives

Saved

497 Lives
1 lives impacted in the last 24 hrs Learn More

Take Our Featured Health Poll

What do you think is the most important health test for women?:
View Results